2.5. Factors that shape cultural behaviours and perspectives. Readings
Cultural Norms in Education: Rote vs Critical Thinking
Rote learning, memorizing information through repetition, is deeply embedded in many educational traditions, particularly in parts of Asia and the Middle East. (Dreher et al, 2021). Research shows that while rote techniques can support factual recall, they often lead to surface-level understanding and less independent problem-solving in higher education contexts. For example, in a survey of Pakistani undergraduates, rote learning correlated with lower performance on analytical tasks than did peers using deep-learning strategies. (Ahmed & Ahmad, 2017). Students from rote-learning traditions often participate cautiously in seminars, asking fewer questions and awaiting confirmation before expressing ideas. Western instructors may perceive these students as disengaged, not recognizing their cultural learning preferences. Conversely, those from critical-thinking backgrounds may dominate discussions, unintentionally overshadowing peers trained in collective or structured learning modes. (Dreher et al, 2021)
example
In an engineering class, students who were used to memorizing information found it hard to adjust to problem-based learning. To help them, the lecturer created “critical-thinking modules” that guided students step-by-step through real-life cases of mechanical problems. Students had to find the cause, think of possible solutions, and explain their reasoning in writing. Over time, even those who preferred memorizing started to think more deeply and became more confident with open-ended tasks.